Wednesday, January 23, 2013


Module 4: Blog Post  Connectivism:




 How has your network changed the way you learn?

In class today my students and I were talking about the advances in technology over the last few years and they were excited to finally have a computer lab that had current software and operating system. I wish it was Windows 8 but as with all things in time we will eventually be current.  The reason why I bring this up is it made me reflect on the fact that I have been working with computer technology longer than most of my students been alive.  Over those many years the way that I and the rest of the world view knowledge and learning have changed.  It is no longer important for us to remember hard facts that would somehow be lost and forgotten.  I no longer spend hours in the library searching through card catalogs hoping to find enough information to write a research paper or a speech in English class.  I no longer have to wait until I have a clear line on the telephone or wait till I get home to use the telephone.  Now I just need to worry if my battery is going to last or my phone will automatically transfer from one cell tower to another as I travel down the highway. 

Computer technology has availed us the opportunity to not only reach out and touch someone distance away but has provided us with an efficient means of gathering information.  Along with this technology comes other issues such as deciding if the information is correct or is someone’s idea of a sick joke.  With the various social media sites such as Facebook, MyBigCampus, Twitter, and others keeping in touch with old friends is easier than having to write a letter and send it into the U.S Postal Service.  Often, we would get tired of writing letters and the friendship sails away into the sunset.  With the Internet it also provides me with the opportunity to travel to distance lands without having to leave the comfort of my sofa and wish that I was there in person.

Which digital tools best facilitate learning for you?

My first source of searching for knowledge is going to the Internet and conducting a search using either of the following search engines: Google or Bing.  Other digital tools that I use include the following; Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, Gotomeetings,

How do you learn new knowledge when you have questions?
It really depends upon the type of knowledge that I seek.  It might be as simple as picking up a cell phone and calling an expert that might know the answer to the question that I have.  Other times it might require me to go online to Google and conduct a web search for web sites that contains the information I need.

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Module 3 Collaborating in a K12 Environment using Technology



Before the digital age or when I was in school I can remember being asked as a student to collaborate with students from accross the country. Back then the only way to communicate with each other was either by a very expensive telephone call or via good ole United States mail service.  Back then we called this having a "Pen Pal" that we were to share our experiences with and get to know what it was like living in a different part of the U.S. As you can imagine, there were several draw backs mainly was the time it took to get a reply from your Pen Pal.  When our letters came we were all excited to share what was written and read the letters to the whole class. 

Slowly at first, the technology revolution was taking shape, first there was the personal compute that allowed us to type our letters on the compute and then print them out and send them in  the mail same as before.  In 1971 Ray Tomlinson developed a web based method of sending mail to another person that was called "Email" or Electronic Mail.  It was not very popular at first due to the lack of the personal computer.  Starting in the early 1990's the Internet became popular and available to the masses, the reason for this surge was the cost of computer became afordable and Tim Berners Lee developed a easier way for the layman to use the Internet called World Wide Web (WWW).

Humans are social animals and thrive in social interaction.  To substantiate this statement all one needs to do is walk into a high school classroom and listen to the students talk to each othe when given permission to visit with each other.  I agree with Rheingoldd's assessment on Wikipedia in the fact that it was intentially developed to allow individuals to post and edit the information that is contained within the web site.  However, with that said one needs to be careful with the content to ensure its validity.

Bellow (2013) when asked what technologies should every teacher know right now stated that for students they should know how to use wiiVideo and UJam are tools that allow students to create their own videos and music online for free  Teachers can easily create lesson plans that would allow a student to conduct research on a given topic and then create a short video presentation on the information found and present the video to the class.  Edmodo has been touted as a Facebook like social media site for schools.  Within Edmodo students can be taught how to act like a responsible digital citizen, and allows students to communicate with students and teachers in a secure envrionment.  The last tool he recommends is a automated toole called If This Then That (IFTTT) which helps teachers control information.

It is still interesting to me that with the fact that computer technology has been around for twenty years or more there are still individuals who are afraid to use technology in any form.  As a result we are not being able to allow our students to collaborate with students in distant lands for fear of them being exposed to for the lack of a better term evil.  If you  teach in a forward thinking district where they embrase technology into the classroom Mandernach and Taylor (2011) provide a wealth of information on how to effectively integrate Web 2.0 applications that foster student engagement.  Taylor (2011) suggest that you consider a number of factors when selecting web 2.0 tools to use in your classroom, such as your learning objective, course level, student population, class size,  and access to technology.


 References:

Rheingold, Howard  video  retrieved from : http://www.ted.com/talks/howard_rheingold_on_collaboration.html
Bellow, Adam retrieved from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2012/11/27/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-future.aspx?Page=2&p=1

Mandernach, B. Jean retrieved from http://teachpsych.com/ebooks/pse2011/vol1/volume1.pdf#page=224

Taylor, Sarah S. retrieved from http://teachpsych.com/ebooks/pse2011/vol1/volume1.pdf#page=224


Thursday, December 27, 2012

Module 2 Blog Post

Module 2 Post

Over the course of my teaching experience I have learned and tried to apply various learning theories from Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism all in the hopes of being able to reach as many students as possible. As my career progressed I came to realize that the best possible way to reach as many students as possible, I needed to incorporate the best of all learning theories as I could.  In reading the two blogs in this weeks modules I can agree with Karl Kapp when he states:

" Cognitivism doesn't explain 100% how humans process information and neither does Constructivism or Behaviorism.  What we need to is take the best from each philosophy and use it wisely to create solid educational experiences for our learners"

Bill Kerr in his blog also points out that the "_isms" do not stand still but are constantly involving as they are implemented by teachers across the world.  An additional thought that Kerr points out is that even the origional theorists have made changes to their theories as new information is gathered.

I have found that the following websites provide helpful information regarding learning theories.
http://otec.uoregon.edu/learning_theory.htm  from the OTEC on this website you will find information regarding Brain Science, Learning Styles, Learning Theories, Theories of Intelligence, General Cognitive Science.

http://www.learning-theories.com/ is a "Webliography" that provides a wealth of information regarding the most used learning theories and paradigms used in education.

References:

http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html

http://www.uleduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/



Saturday, October 27, 2012

Module 4 Post: Engaging Learners in a Digital World


Since the Internet became popular in the 90's we have seen a influx of online learning environments from as early as first grade to post graduate work.  Throughout this time there has been several methods of delivering content to students and teachers measuring the amount of learning that has been accomplished by the learner.  There are those who will provide you with evidence that describes how effective learning is online compared to the traditonal learning environment. On the same note, there are equally the same amount of people who will tell you that online learning is not as effective.  Could both be right?  Being in education for 15 years I have to say that yes both parties are right.  What is it then that makes the difference, or better yet what makes online learning effective?

In order to make online learning effective it first starts out with a caring instructor who reaches out and cares about the student's success. Just as an Face to Face (F2F) learning an instructor carefully monitors and provides timely feed back to the students.  If a student is not performing a specific task the instructors should immediately contact the students and find out what is wrong and develop ways to remedy the problem before it becomes impossible to fix.

In an online learning enviornment, it is important to develop an effective learning management system that clearly describes what is to be expected.  If the students are to create online content then there should be a universal or standard site in which a student should perform the tasks at hand.  An instructor should be able to have the ability to change and modify the content of the course to fit the needs of his/her students. 

To effectively communicate with students in the classroom there should be open ended questions that we could place a question about a problem that we are having within our school, job or course work that students can provide needed insight.  It would also be nice to provide a location in which we can also communicate with each other using tools such as skype or other video conferencing tools on the internet.

References:
Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Edmonton, Canada: AU Press.
Siemens, G. (2008, January). Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers. ITForum.

Blogs:

http://virtualschooling.wordpress.com/
http://gettingsmart.com/blog/

Saturday, October 13, 2012

Module 3 Post



Module 3 post
Assessing Collaborative Efforts
Palloff (2007) describes learning as an active process in which both learners and teachers are involved in the learning process.  In my classrooms I have provided several opportunities for my students to work collaboratively in the classroom realizing that when they finally graduate from high school and enter the real world they are not going to be an island unto themselves but will be forced to work with other individuals.  As I place the students into teams I try to monitor the efforts of each teammate to determine if there are any problems.  Usually there will be one student who will become the leader of the group and yet another student who will try to coast through the assignment without doing anything. 
The question becomes how to you properly assess their work both as a group and as an individual, when do you as an instructor step in to correct any administrative problems.
Dr. Siemen (2008) suggest that the grading policies reflect the following three elements ; students should be assessed by their peers in the learning group, receive feeback for their learning communities and grades should be based upon their contributions.   There will be however, students who will not want to contribute to their team and be expected to reap the grade of the group.  If this happens it is up to the instructor to step in and visit with the students and inform them that if they are not actively involved then they will fail the project.

References:
Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Assessment of collaborative learning. Baltimore, MD: Author.
 
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
 

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Video Storyboard

Below is the storyboard for the video project. The pictures did not show up./  You should see the images by clicking on this link: Storyboard



Video Storyboard

 

TITLE of Project:  _Effective Integration of Digital Technology in the Classroom____________________________

 

SUBJECT:  ___Walden Univeristy______________________________   PAGE:  2  of  13

 

 

VIDEO                                                                                                       
AUDIO
Rough sketch of the shot. Stick figures acceptable.
Narration, voiceover script, dialogue, sound effects, music, etc.

 

Sample

 
 
Title Screen:  Effective Use of Educational Technology
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Uplifting music to build excitement and enthusiasm
 
Developing Effective Technology Plans
·        Plan for short term not long term
·        Focus on applications
·        Go beyond enhancing the curriculum.
·         


 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effective technology is defined a more than computers
 
 
Effective Technology plan stresses integration of technology into the curriculum


 

 
Effective technology plans include staff development
 
 
Interview with teacher describing how they use computer technology in their classroom.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interview with students on what they are feel about interviewing technology


 

 
Equalizing underserved students providing Broadband service and
 
 
Using Skype in the classroom
 
Designing classrooms for the future
 
References and Credits
 

 

Friday, September 28, 2012

Post Two: Module Two

Distance Education

George Siemans (Laurette 2008) discusses the principals of distance education and breaks down  how he envisions  current and future distance education in a K-12 setting by breaking it down into three distinct areas;  The Virtual school: a school without walls that teaches its students strictly on the Internet.  In the state of Idaho there is a state law that was recently passes that mandates students in high school to take at least one online course in order to graduate from high school.  A collaborative system; Siemmans  provides two examples the Iowa Communication Network and the South Dakota network both states have invested sizeable amounts of funds to provide fiber optic cabling to each school though out the state that provides the opportunities for collaborative sharing of content. This also makes it possible to share resources and be able to have one teacher teach content in two different locations   The last category that is discusses is the Mirrored schools.  This is the one that interests me most because it is used within the same school district, the curriculum is the same at both local and distance locations.  In the Lander County School District we have two high schools that are separated by over 90 miles.  The smaller school district can benefit from the larger high school streaming its class period via Skype or other electronic device over to Austin High School.


In this website he describes how change is rapid and often takes us by surprise.  The most important message that is contained in the blog is this message:

·  A teacher teaches; an educator reaches.

·  A teacher typically focuses on curriculum and assessment. An educator focuses on development and evaluation.

·  In the curricular race, a teacher perspires. In the journey of lifelong learning, an educator inspires. (An educator goes the extra mile.)

·  A teacher works with content. An educator deals with people.

·  Teaching is a job. Educating is a calling.

·  Some teachers do this to earn. Educators do this to learn (about themselves, their learners, better ways to inspire, etc).

·  A teacher might network locally. An educator is connected globally (and thinks and acts that way too)

The Instructional Innovations Blog at Indiana University http://icoblog.wordpress.com/category/distance-education/

In this blog the author describes what cloud storage is by comparing it to money that a person deposits into a local bank.  The owner of the money does not need to constantly need to go to the bank to access his money but rather he can access his account by using the Internet, cell phone, or any computer device.  By using cloud storage devices it also makes it easier to work collaboratively on a given project.  There are even some cloud storage devices that also provide a medium where you can also edit your document such as Google Docs, and Microsoft Office Live.

 

 

 

 

Laureate Education, Inc. (2008). Siemens, George: The Future of Distance Education. Principles of distance education. Baltimore, MD: Author